Genetically Engineered Foods Essay Example for Free

geneticalally Enginee cherry nourishments Essaygenetically engineered or genetically special nourishments are foods that are simply the result of alteration in the original genes of an organism such as a plant or an animal in order to blot out a feature article or trait of the original organism. Because this involves the transfer of genes, Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) are also known as transgenic organisms (Robert Sace risque-GMO, Genetically Modified Foods and Conspiracy Theories). GE foods can be contrasted with organic foods which are basically foods which brook a non-synthetic method of processing before distri hardlyion to the creation. This issue holds immense global importance because it is considered to be an alternative to solving the macrocosm Hunger crisis by supplying GE foods to countries with an inadequate supply of food (Anup Shah GE Technologies allow solve earth hunger Jeffrey Heit, MD-Genetically Engineered Foods ).In this paper, the relativ e advantages and disadvantages of distributing GE foods to the unrestricted will be discovered and weighed. The notion of GE engine room being the sole alternative to solving World Hunger will also be investigated along with the medical prognosis of using organic food sort of of GE food. In the article, Is GE food safe?, Anup Shah argues that although there is a possibility the use of GE foods can be beneficial to the general public, it cannot be said that this will last forever. The importance of this plight is being measured by the fact that there is absolutely no scientific proof at the moment to predict the effects of these crops in the foresee equal future, though we big businessman know a heavy(p) deal around their initial avails to health and industry. David C. litter agrees with this point of view and states that man has tampered with the very effect of our food supply as part of the continuing quest to out-do God.He goes on to talk about the unpredictability of altering genes. Stating in an example that certain genes from a floundera fish wee-wee been inserted into tomatoes in order to give them a longer shelf life and that splicing genetic segments of oneness species into the genes of another could never occur naturally, he goes on to measure the importance of this issue by comparability data from original research work that had been carried out to specialise the relative advantages of golden rice and soybeans compared to the secureness varieties available in the market (David C. Pack -Genetically Engineered Foods Why the Controversy?). Jeffrey Heit, MD, in Genetically Engineered Foods confirms that that the use of GE foods might entail a cheap and efficient industrialsystem but the public might not benefit from it the way we think it will.For instance, the use of peanut genes in tomatoes might adversely travel people allergic to peanuts and tomatoes being irreplaceable ingredients in almost all kinds of curry based foods alter the s ituation. On the other hand, slightly authors like Amy Norton argue that Vitamin A deficiency can cause cecity and, because it dampens immune system function, leaves children more vulnerable to becoming severely ill from infections. If all children in deprive areas were given enough vitamin A, up to 2.7 million deaths could be prevented each year according to statistics. Genetically engineered capsules rich in vitamin A could be provided to the children in the aforementioned deprived areas. UNICEF has a program to give new children vitamin A capsules twice a year (one capsule is secure for a six-month supply of the vitamin).A ramble on of foods naturally contain vitamin A or vitamin A precursors from liver, fish oil and eggs to spinach, carrots, mango and red peppers. But again, those foods may either be locally unavailable, depend on season, or be priced beyond what most families in developing nations can afford (Amy Norton- Genetically modified rice a good vitamin A source 1 4 Janice Jones- Advantages Disadvantages of Organic Foods). In another article the author, Bryan Walsh talks about the descent betwixt humane eggs and the way the laying hens are brought up or bred. He hints at the possibility of there being something worse than genetic engineering at hand, which is the way animals are brought up in farms, more specifically chickens. Hence, if such a relationship exists then there seem to be more pressing matters at hand than just the apparent side-effects of GE foods (Bryan Walsh-Vital Farms Raising the Ultra-Organic Egg).Christie Wilcox adopts a antithetical approach by targeting some of the myths held by people in favor of organic farming as opposed to genetically engineered farming. She talks about how pesticides are used abundantly in organic farming, how organic food is not healthier than GE food and how it is not ideal for the environment ideas that are uncouth amongst the general public about organic food (Christie Wilcox Myth busting 1 01 Organic Farming stately Agriculture). Backing up the aspect that genetically engineered foods are unsafe and should not be distributed to the general public since their after effects have not yet been discovered, Anup Shah states in an article how mankindwide polls propose a high public demand of labeling GE food so as toenable the public to choose their preference of food.She points out that any failure to do so implies that the public is ignorant. Is it justified to keep an eye on the public in the dark just because we think the public is too ignorant to grasp the import of GE food? On the other hand, is it okay to not label food as genetically engineered or not genetically engineered because of the growing apprehension that there will be competition between GE based and non GE based food companies? ( Anup Shah- Public Concerns and Protests on GE Food). While some believe that genetically engineered foods are generally regarded as safe. There has been no adequate testing, however, to ensure gross(a) safety. There are no reports of illness or injury due to genetically engineered foods (Jeffrey Heit, MD- Genetically engineered foods). On the very other end, some people believe that genetically engineered technology is our only hope in abating the ongoing World Hunger problem. However, some people disagree.The idea that genetically engineered technologies can solve world hunger is unreliable. It might have the potential to abet the developing nations in fighting the food crisis but it is amongst the many other alternatives present. A significant number of people in the third world countries are unable to get food because it is expensive, not because it is unavailable. As we can see, the issue of a spheres economy is closely tied with the world hunger problem in this case (Anup Shah- GE Technologies will solve world hunger). There are various questions we need to ask ourselves if we want to determine the safety GE food to human beings. In the event th at this technology achieves its current aim, who will benefit more, people in need or the people who need more? If we are not able to predict the potential side effects of genetically engineered food, is it safe to miss this one chance to yield poverty or even world hunger for that matter?If not, then will not winning the leap be worth it in the long run? One reason why GE technology is being given the go-ahead is that there is a lot of money and profit relate in this. Hence from a business perspective it is more favorable, for example to produce crops that can be resistant to your pesticides (so that you can apply more of them). Keeping this perspective in mind, is it moral to jeopardize the prospect of hunger free countries? Does the expression man tampering with nature also apply to scenarios in which Genetic engineering has helped the human race develop the food market? (David C. Pack-GeneticallyEngineered Foods Why the Controversy? David C. Pack)The author mentions how the carrefour breeding of seeds needs to be prevented so as to prevent any food anomalies in the industry. Considering how contrastive animals like cows and buffaloes are cross-bred, how justified is it to combine and merge the habits of unlike animals who are otherwise different in various aspects? Whereas the problem of World Hunger is concerned, if it cannot be solved by GE crops and is coupled to poverty instead, will the eradication of poverty solve the predicament of world hunger?If hunger is an effect of poverty where poverty is a political and economic issue then politics influences how it is produced who it is produced by and for what purposes it is produced. David C. Pack would also agree Even the problem of world hunger cannot be solved using this technology since the yield of GM crops is even lesser than that of natural (regular) crops (David C. Pack -Genetically Engineered Foods Why the Controversy?). In conclusion, cryptograph can be said with absolute certainty about t he pros and cons of using this kind of technology but what can be done in this field is research in order to determine the order of magnitude of change it is capable of delivering in the long run.ReferencesAlexandra Sifferlin -California fails to pass genetically modified foods labeling initiative http//healthland.time.com/2012/11/07/california-fails-to-pass-gm-foods-labeling-initiative/ Amy Norton Genetically modified rice a good vitamin A source http//www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_128308.html Anup Shah -Is GE Food unafraid?http//www.globalissues.org/article/189/is-ge-food-safeAnup Shah -GE Technologies will solve world hunger http//www.globalissues.org/article/190/ge-technologies-will-solve-world-hunger Anup Shah -Public Concerns and Protests on GE Foodhttp//www.globalissues.org/article/196/a-huge-wave-of-public-concern Bryan Walsh -Vital Farms Raising the Ultra-Organic Egg http//science.time.com/2012/10/22/vital-farms-raising-the-ultra-organic-egg/